Managing regulation and risk, Twitter goes to court in India and sharing your banned list

Hello and welcome to Everything in Moderation, your at-a-glance review of the week's content moderation and online safety news and analysis. It's written by me, Ben Whitelaw.

A big welcome to new faces from Linternaverde, Alltrails, the University of Nottingham, Linklaters, Google, Unit 21, Khoros and other cracks and crevices of the web. If you were forward this email — or clicked a link and ended up here —  subscribe now to get it in your inbox every Friday. You can also support the newsletter to help cover the costs of it and to keep it free for others to enjoy.

(Support the newsletter by becoming an individual or organisation member)

This week's edition is shorter than usual as I'm in Amsterdam for the weekend seeing some friends (Want to say hi? Let me know). Here's your newsletter - BW

Policies

New and emerging internet policy and online speech regulation

The UK's proposed online speech regulator has announced that there will be "high-risk services for closer supervision" which will have less time to comply with new duties of the Online Safety Bill when it is passed. Ofcom hinted at a tiered approach this week, as it published its roadmap to regulation and a call for evidence on key areas of the Bill, including risk of harm from illegal content, child access assessments, and transparency requirements.

It also committed to publishing a draft Code of Practice on illegal content harms within 100 days of the bill being passed in 2023 (although after what happened this week, who knows when that will actually happen).